data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46a30/46a306bf6d72b04c1e6d4177b0b839140af5e3c9" alt=""
I'm still a little baffled by AbsolutePoker
I haven't played in a MTT in over a week, and very few for the last month or so. My bankroll has grown more healthily in the last months or so than at any other time in the last year. Coincidence? I think not.
That said, I like playing MTTs, probably more than anything else. There's just no other rush like doing well in one, moving closer and closer to the final table, eyes full not of stars but of big fat juicy payouts. But I also know myself too well, especially my tendencies to take too many shots at too many MTTs. My reasoning is always that while slow, steady winning at lower limits is nice, it will never make a noticeable difference in my normal standard of living, whereas winning a $100,000 guaranteed, well, that would. The logical, rational side of me knows that's bullshit, and that slow and steady is the way to go, but, well, everyone has to say screw logic sometime in order to stay happy and sane.
In an attempt to get the best of both worlds, here's my new plan. At the end of each month I'll earmark 20% of my profit from the previous month for a MTT fund. Anything I win stays in the MTT fund. Initially I'll likely be playing cheaper satellite qualifiers and what-not, as 20% of my monthly poker profits isn't a huge sum of money at all. Hopefully that'll help scratch the MTT itch and, as a nice side effect, help me focus more on the daily ring game grind, giving myself a "reward" for some of the less than fun grinding. All without hurting the bottom line too much, as has been the case in the past.
I have absolutely no reason to believe this, but I think Texas will finally beat OU this weekend. That is all I have to say about that.
No comments:
Post a Comment